COMMENTS ABOUT THE APPRAISAL OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY [VERSION 2; PEER REVIEW: 2 APPROVED, 1 APPROVED WITH RESERVATIONS]

Comments about the appraisal of systematic reviews in restorative dentistry [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Comments about the appraisal of systematic reviews in restorative dentistry [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Blog Article

Adequate adoption of evidence-based practice is deeply rooted in accessing methodological quality and completeness of systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting.Nonetheless, this assumption might be flawed if the methodological quality assessment has not been properly conducted.Taking the former statement into klaire labs ashwagandha consideration, this correspondence article encourages the improvement of future tertiary manuscripts, especially in the field of restorative dentistry.Thus, this article addresses an overview of reviews in restorative dentistry by Sarkis-Onofre et al.

in the May 2019 issue of the Journal of sex shop arles Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry as an example of evaluating tertiary evidence for increasing the awareness of reviewers, authors, and readers.

Report this page